<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Kinematics on Signal &amp; Syntax</title><link>https://signal-and-syntax.com/tags/kinematics/</link><description>Recent content in Kinematics on Signal &amp; Syntax</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://signal-and-syntax.com/tags/kinematics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Rethinking the Three-Second Traffic Rule: When Physics Says It’s Not Enough</title><link>https://signal-and-syntax.com/posts/safe-distance-in-traffic/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://signal-and-syntax.com/posts/safe-distance-in-traffic/</guid><description>While researching why car insurance rates are so extremely high in Las Vegas, I started thinking about the three-second rule and its validity. As I&amp;rsquo;ve always heard, the three-second rule refers to how far you should be behind a car in traffic. The idea is that you pick out a fixed roadside marker and you are supposed to pass that marker at least three seconds after the car in front of you.</description></item></channel></rss>